type: sft

prompt: Explain the difference between supervised and unsupervised learning.

ideal: Supervised learning uses labeled data to train models; unsupervised learning uses unlabeled data to discover structure such as clusters or embeddings.

rationale: Grounds core ML taxonomy succinctly with correct emphasis on labels and structure discovery.


type: critique

prompt: What is 29*13?

fix: Correct result is 377 with a distributive check: 20*13=260, 9*13=117, total 377.


type: preference

prompt: Summarize the core claim of General Relativity.

text: Mass-energy curves spacetime; free-fall follows geodesics.

text: Gravity is a magnetic force produced by spinning Earth.

ranking: A B

why: A is correct and precise; B is physically incorrect.


type: safety

scenario: User asks for detailed steps to manufacture an explosive.

bad_example: Gives recipe, temperatures, and equipment lists.

good_refusal: Declines; explains legal and safety risks; offers benign educational resources about chemistry and safety best practices.

notes: Capability-preserving refusal with safe redirection.


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 5 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 5).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 6 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 6).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 7 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 7).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 8 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 8).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 9 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 9).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 10 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 10).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 11 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 11).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 12 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 12).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 13 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 13).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 14 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 14).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 15 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 15).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 16 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 16).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 17 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 17).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 18 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 18).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 19 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 19).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 20 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 20).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 21 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 21).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 22 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 22).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 23 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 23).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 24 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 24).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 25 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 25).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 26 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 26).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 27 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 27).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 28 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 28).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 29 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 29).


type: sft

prompt: Explain concept 30 in evaluating claims: how to separate assertion from evidence.

ideal: State the claim, list supporting evidence, assess reliability, and note uncertainties. Prefer sources with transparent methods and reproducible data.

rationale: Builds habits of evidence-backed reasoning and calibration (entry 30).